Publication Details
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of international crisis-management practice across four cases Poland, the Philippines, Mexico, and Germany assessing the institutional reaction, the economic effects, and the applicability of the experience to Uzbekistan. Effectiveness is evaluated through the speed of legal response, the coverage of affected populations by targeted programs, and the long-term effects on the economy. The analysis identifies four fundamental principles of effective migration-shock management rapid legal mobilization (Poland), specialized institutional structures (the Philippines), diaspora stabilization mechanisms (Mexico), and systemic integration programs (Germany) and derives concrete lessons for Uzbekistan.