Publication Details
Issue: Vol 3, No 1 (2026)
Pages: 85-91
ISSN: 2997-3899

Abstract

Equivalence is one of the central and most debated concepts in translation studies. It refers to the relationship established between a source text and a target text when both communicate similar meanings, functions, effects, or cultural values. However, complete correspondence between languages is rarely possible because linguistic systems differ in grammar, vocabulary, style, and cultural associations. This article examines major theoretical approaches to translation equivalence, including formal, dynamic, textual, functional, semantic, and pragmatic equivalence. Particular attention is given to the views of Eugene Nida, John Catford, Peter Newmark, Mona Baker, and Juliane House. The article also discusses lexical, grammatical, cultural, and pragmatic problems that translators face when searching for equivalent expressions. Examples from English, Uzbek, and Russian demonstrate that equivalence should not be understood as absolute identity. It is better viewed as a context-dependent relationship shaped by communicative purpose, target audience, genre, and cultural environment. The study concludes that successful translation requires the translator to balance semantic accuracy, natural expression, stylistic appropriateness, and communicative effect.

Keywords
translation equivalence formal equivalence dynamic equivalence semantic equivalence functional equivalence source text target text translation theory.